<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>R-fx Networks &#187; linux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rfxn.com/tag/linux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rfxn.com</link>
	<description> Linux Software &#38; Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 10:43:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>LMD 1.4: Little Something For Everyone!</title>
		<link>http://www.rfxn.com/lmd-1-4-little-something-for-everyone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rfxn.com/lmd-1-4-little-something-for-everyone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 05:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan M.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bsd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lmd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfxn.com/?p=870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The much awaited for 1.4 release of Linux Malware Detect is here! In this release there is quite literally something for everyone, from massive performance gains to FreeBSD support and everything in between . For those who wish to dive straight into it, you can run the -d or &#8211;update-ver option to update your install <a href="http://www.rfxn.com/lmd-1-4-little-something-for-everyone/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rfxn.com/lmd-1-4-little-something-for-everyone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ATA Over Ethernet: As an Alternative</title>
		<link>http://www.rfxn.com/ata-over-ethernet-as-an-alternative/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rfxn.com/ata-over-ethernet-as-an-alternative/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 13:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan M.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HowTo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aoe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[raid]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfxn.com/?p=819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New technologies, new toys &#8212; Oh how I love getting my hands dirty with them. Today I am going to have a look at ATA Over Ethernet (AoE) as an alternative solution to NFS in the role of a NAS/SAN implementation. We will look at both the server side vblade setup and the client side <a href="http://www.rfxn.com/ata-over-ethernet-as-an-alternative/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rfxn.com/ata-over-ethernet-as-an-alternative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Raid Management: Know Whats Really Going On</title>
		<link>http://www.rfxn.com/raid-management-know-whats-really-going-on/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rfxn.com/raid-management-know-whats-really-going-on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 05:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan M.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HowTo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[raid]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfxn.com/?p=748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In today&#8217;s hosting environment it is common place for servers to have hardware based raid cards but what is not common place is having a reliable method for checking the status of the raid arrays. Few would question the value to data integrity by making use of raid technology but very few organizations and businesses <a href="http://www.rfxn.com/raid-management-know-whats-really-going-on/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rfxn.com/raid-management-know-whats-really-going-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LMD 1.3.7: Milestones, Fixes &amp; Signature Updates</title>
		<link>http://www.rfxn.com/lmd-1-3-7-fixes-signature-updates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rfxn.com/lmd-1-3-7-fixes-signature-updates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 18:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan M.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lmd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfxn.com/?p=721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today marks the release of LMD 1.3.7, which is a minor release update that fixes a few bugs and is also the final 1.x release before version 2.0 as described in the LMD: one year later blog post. The bug list for LMD has remained very small over the last 6 months and this release <a href="http://www.rfxn.com/lmd-1-3-7-fixes-signature-updates/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rfxn.com/lmd-1-3-7-fixes-signature-updates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LMD: One Year Later</title>
		<link>http://www.rfxn.com/lmd-one-year-later/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rfxn.com/lmd-one-year-later/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 16:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan M.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bsd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lmd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[projects]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfxn.com/?p=688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With my move back to Canada behind me and adjusting to some new routines with life, its about time to get back into the mix with the projects. Though things have been slow the last couple of months, it has not stopped me from making sure regular and prompt malware updates are released. Today, we <a href="http://www.rfxn.com/lmd-one-year-later/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rfxn.com/lmd-one-year-later/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Linux Malware Detect v1.3.6: Loose Ends</title>
		<link>http://www.rfxn.com/linux-malware-detect-loose-ends/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rfxn.com/linux-malware-detect-loose-ends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 17:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan M.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lmd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[projects]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfxn.com/?p=511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In LMD 1.3.3 there was allot of changes, 29 to be exact, that made LMD much more robust and especially the monitoring component, much more usable. If that release was about making good things better, then this release is about bringing loose ends together. I spent a couple of days running LMD through its paces <a href="http://www.rfxn.com/linux-malware-detect-loose-ends/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rfxn.com/linux-malware-detect-loose-ends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Let The Rewrites Begin: New Life For PRM</title>
		<link>http://www.rfxn.com/let-the-rewrites-begin-new-life-for-prm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rfxn.com/let-the-rewrites-begin-new-life-for-prm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 16:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan M.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bsd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[projects]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfxn.com/?p=502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my last post, I reflected on the last 7-8 years of projects here at rfxn.com, in doing so I also dug up some statistics on project downloads. I not only did this for my own curiosity but to prioritize the mile long to do list I have for the projects, based on downloads. One <a href="http://www.rfxn.com/let-the-rewrites-begin-new-life-for-prm/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rfxn.com/let-the-rewrites-begin-new-life-for-prm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Better Late Than Never: Linux Malware Detect 1.3</title>
		<link>http://www.rfxn.com/better-late-than-never-linux-malware-detect-1-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rfxn.com/better-late-than-never-linux-malware-detect-1-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 05:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan M.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lmd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[projects]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfxn.com/?p=432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today I have released Linux Malware Detect (LMD) 1.3, the first public stable release of my malware detection tool. The documentation is a little thin but the details are on the project page and the README file should fill you in on anything you need to know, otherwise you can post a comment on the <a href="http://www.rfxn.com/better-late-than-never-linux-malware-detect-1-3/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rfxn.com/better-late-than-never-linux-malware-detect-1-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BFD 1.4: Important Security Fix</title>
		<link>http://www.rfxn.com/bfd-1-4-important-security-fix/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rfxn.com/bfd-1-4-important-security-fix/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 15:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan M.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bfd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfxn.com/?p=364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today I have put up a new release of BFD, version 1.4, that addresses an unsanitized variable issue that is used on the command line. This is a serious issue and should be treated as such, if you currently have BFD installed I would encourage you to update it immediately, the install.sh script in the <a href="http://www.rfxn.com/bfd-1-4-important-security-fix/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rfxn.com/bfd-1-4-important-security-fix/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nginx: Caching Proxy</title>
		<link>http://www.rfxn.com/nginx-caching-proxy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rfxn.com/nginx-caching-proxy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 18:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan M.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HowTo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apache]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nginx]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfxn.com/?p=261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently I started to tackle a load problem on one of my personal sites, the issue was that of a poorly written but exceedingly MySQL heavy application and the load it would induce on the SQL server when 400-500 people were hammering the site at once. Further compounding this was Apache&#8217;s horrible ability to gracefully <a href="http://www.rfxn.com/nginx-caching-proxy/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rfxn.com/nginx-caching-proxy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IRSYNC &amp; Limiting Passwordless SSH Keys</title>
		<link>http://www.rfxn.com/irsync-limiting-passwordless-ssh-keys/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rfxn.com/irsync-limiting-passwordless-ssh-keys/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 15:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan M.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HowTo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incremental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rsync]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfxn.com/?p=223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone who has ever used SSH key-pairs to access more than a couple of servers (or hundreds in my case), will tell you they are an invaluable convenience. It is a natural progression and very common usage that SSH key-pairs are coupled with other common tasks or tools, where having a pass phrase attached to <a href="http://www.rfxn.com/irsync-limiting-passwordless-ssh-keys/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rfxn.com/irsync-limiting-passwordless-ssh-keys/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Upgrade CentOS 4.8 to 5.x (32bit)</title>
		<link>http://www.rfxn.com/upgrade-centos-4-to-5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rfxn.com/upgrade-centos-4-to-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 07:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan M.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HowTo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[centos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfxn.com/?p=162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Traditionally, the dist upgrade path that many were familiar with from the RH8/9-&#62;Fedora or similarly Fedora dist upgrades, have applied more or less to RHEL/CentOS but with the release of 4.5 and early releases of 5.0 the actual dist upgrade path was messy or nearly impossible. The early versions of 5.0 (up to 5.2) had <a href="http://www.rfxn.com/upgrade-centos-4-to-5/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rfxn.com/upgrade-centos-4-to-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Linux Malware Detectection</title>
		<link>http://www.rfxn.com/linux-malware-detectection/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rfxn.com/linux-malware-detectection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 05:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan M.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snort]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfxn.com/?p=149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[ UPDATE: Linux Malware Detect has been released ] I have the last few weeks been working on a new project for malware detection on Linux web servers, it is already at a pre-release version in use at work and it has shown phenomenal promise. Right to it, some background&#8230; On a daily basis the <a href="http://www.rfxn.com/linux-malware-detectection/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rfxn.com/linux-malware-detectection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;oops&#8221; Wrong Server!</title>
		<link>http://www.rfxn.com/oops-wrong-server/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rfxn.com/oops-wrong-server/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan M.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[My Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[r1soft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfxn.com/?p=88</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So this past weekend, I did the unthinkable, I accidentally recycled the wrong dedicated server at work. Usually, this is not much of an issue  (not that I make a habit of it) with the continuous data protection we have implemented at the data center (cdp r1soft) except that the backup server this particular client <a href="http://www.rfxn.com/oops-wrong-server/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rfxn.com/oops-wrong-server/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

