<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>R-fx Networks &#187; My Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rfxn.com/category/my-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rfxn.com</link>
	<description> Linux Software &#38; Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 10:43:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>LMD 1.4.1: Delivering on your requests</title>
		<link>http://www.rfxn.com/lmd-1-4-1-delivering-on-your-requests/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rfxn.com/lmd-1-4-1-delivering-on-your-requests/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 11:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan M.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lmd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[projects]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfxn.com/?p=917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The release of LMD 1.4.1 is now live and with it comes a few new features. In this small update, I have tried to deliver on on a couple of common feature requests from users which were in-line with my development goals. That said, right to it&#8230; The biggest change has come in the form <a href="http://www.rfxn.com/lmd-1-4-1-delivering-on-your-requests/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rfxn.com/lmd-1-4-1-delivering-on-your-requests/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Linux Malware Detect: 2 Years Strong</title>
		<link>http://www.rfxn.com/linux-malware-detect-2-years-strong/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rfxn.com/linux-malware-detect-2-years-strong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 08:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan M.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lmd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfxn.com/?p=894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As cliche as it sounds, where has the time gone? Today we celebrate two years of Linux Malware Detect, open-source (web) malware detection. The project has seen allot of change since the first release. What was initially started as an internal project to deal with a large increase in malware activity at my job, a <a href="http://www.rfxn.com/linux-malware-detect-2-years-strong/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rfxn.com/linux-malware-detect-2-years-strong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ATA Over Ethernet: As an Alternative</title>
		<link>http://www.rfxn.com/ata-over-ethernet-as-an-alternative/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rfxn.com/ata-over-ethernet-as-an-alternative/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 13:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan M.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HowTo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aoe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[raid]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfxn.com/?p=819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New technologies, new toys &#8212; Oh how I love getting my hands dirty with them. Today I am going to have a look at ATA Over Ethernet (AoE) as an alternative solution to NFS in the role of a NAS/SAN implementation. We will look at both the server side vblade setup and the client side <a href="http://www.rfxn.com/ata-over-ethernet-as-an-alternative/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rfxn.com/ata-over-ethernet-as-an-alternative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LMD 1.3.9r1: Hexdepth Bug</title>
		<link>http://www.rfxn.com/lmd-v1-3-9r1-hexdepth-bug/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rfxn.com/lmd-v1-3-9r1-hexdepth-bug/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2011 04:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan M.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lmd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[projects]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfxn.com/?p=844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have put up a revision to the 1.3.9 release of LMD that fixes a hexdepth bug in which malware greater than 65Kbytes would cause an error in the internal hexstring.pl script and be considered clean on the stage2 hex scanning of malware. This would mean that unless malware had a MD5 signature for it <a href="http://www.rfxn.com/lmd-v1-3-9r1-hexdepth-bug/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rfxn.com/lmd-v1-3-9r1-hexdepth-bug/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On The Road: Network Disaster &amp; Dual Public-Private Network</title>
		<link>http://www.rfxn.com/on-the-road-network-disaster-dual-public-private-network/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rfxn.com/on-the-road-network-disaster-dual-public-private-network/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 15:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan M.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[My Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfxn.com/?p=804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As an administrator within a mid-sized organization, you can find yourself wearing many occupational hats, which becomes only second nature after awhile. One of these many hats I wear, is that of lead network administrator, which is something I am particularly fond of&#8230; I love networking and everything about it (except maybe wiring racks and <a href="http://www.rfxn.com/on-the-road-network-disaster-dual-public-private-network/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rfxn.com/on-the-road-network-disaster-dual-public-private-network/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Data Integrity: AIDE for Host Based Intrusion Detection</title>
		<link>http://www.rfxn.com/data-integrity-aide-for-host-based-intrusion-detection/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rfxn.com/data-integrity-aide-for-host-based-intrusion-detection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 15:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan M.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HowTo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIDE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ids]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfxn.com/?p=787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It used to be all the talk, everyone knew it, accepted it but few did anything about it and still even today, very few do anything about it. What is it? Data Integrity. But it is not in the form of how we usually look at data integrity; it is not backups, raid management or <a href="http://www.rfxn.com/data-integrity-aide-for-host-based-intrusion-detection/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rfxn.com/data-integrity-aide-for-host-based-intrusion-detection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LMD 1.3.9: Quietly Awesome</title>
		<link>http://www.rfxn.com/lmd-1-3-9-quietly-awesome/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rfxn.com/lmd-1-3-9-quietly-awesome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 08:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan M.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lmd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfxn.com/?p=781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has been a busy couple of weeks for the LMD project, lots of late nights and sleepless days behind me and I can say I am a &#8216;little&#8217; happier with where things are in the project now This release has no major feature changes or additions other than a modification in the default hexdepth <a href="http://www.rfxn.com/lmd-1-3-9-quietly-awesome/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rfxn.com/lmd-1-3-9-quietly-awesome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Happy Birthday APF: 8 Years Strong</title>
		<link>http://www.rfxn.com/happy-birthday-apf-8-years-strong/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rfxn.com/happy-birthday-apf-8-years-strong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 17:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan M.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[My Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfxn.com/?p=775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On this day eight years ago, Advanced Policy Firewall (APF) version 0.5 for Linux was publicly released. Since then, APF has stood the test of time and still remains to this day, one of the most widely used Linux firewall solutions, with especially high usage in the web hosting industry. I was 18 years old <a href="http://www.rfxn.com/happy-birthday-apf-8-years-strong/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rfxn.com/happy-birthday-apf-8-years-strong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Raid Management: Know Whats Really Going On</title>
		<link>http://www.rfxn.com/raid-management-know-whats-really-going-on/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rfxn.com/raid-management-know-whats-really-going-on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 05:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan M.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HowTo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[raid]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfxn.com/?p=748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In today&#8217;s hosting environment it is common place for servers to have hardware based raid cards but what is not common place is having a reliable method for checking the status of the raid arrays. Few would question the value to data integrity by making use of raid technology but very few organizations and businesses <a href="http://www.rfxn.com/raid-management-know-whats-really-going-on/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rfxn.com/raid-management-know-whats-really-going-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook &amp; Twitter: Meh</title>
		<link>http://www.rfxn.com/facebook-twitter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rfxn.com/facebook-twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 06:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan M.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[My Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfxn.com/?p=738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a short one, the title says it all. I have decided to start doing a bit more casual posting (tweeting?) on a twitter account I just setup and since I already toss a bunch of crap on my fcbk account about rfxn.com, figured I would throw everyone the details for both: http://facebook.com/ryanm84 http://twitter.com/rfxn]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rfxn.com/facebook-twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Donations: By The Numbers</title>
		<link>http://www.rfxn.com/donations-by-the-numbers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rfxn.com/donations-by-the-numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 05:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan M.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[My Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfxn.com/?p=705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was recently asked by someone about the donations that rfxn.com receives, more specifically what it amounts to. In the interest of answering this person and anyone else who may be curious, I thought I would put together a small post about it. Firstly, what needs to be said is that although the projects have <a href="http://www.rfxn.com/donations-by-the-numbers/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rfxn.com/donations-by-the-numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LMD: One Year Later</title>
		<link>http://www.rfxn.com/lmd-one-year-later/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rfxn.com/lmd-one-year-later/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 16:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan M.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bsd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lmd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[projects]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfxn.com/?p=688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With my move back to Canada behind me and adjusting to some new routines with life, its about time to get back into the mix with the projects. Though things have been slow the last couple of months, it has not stopped me from making sure regular and prompt malware updates are released. Today, we <a href="http://www.rfxn.com/lmd-one-year-later/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rfxn.com/lmd-one-year-later/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Signature Updates &amp; Threat Database</title>
		<link>http://www.rfxn.com/signature-updates-threat-database/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rfxn.com/signature-updates-threat-database/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 15:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan M.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lmd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[projects]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfxn.com/?p=677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has been a very active month for those that pay attention to the signatures as they are released, you might have noticed a sudden spike about two weeks ago in signatures from 2,500&#8242;ish to the now 4,425 mark. The vast majority of these signatures were put up in MD5 format as a great many <a href="http://www.rfxn.com/signature-updates-threat-database/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rfxn.com/signature-updates-threat-database/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tracking &amp; Killing Bot Networks</title>
		<link>http://www.rfxn.com/tracking-killing-bot-networks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rfxn.com/tracking-killing-bot-networks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 09:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan M.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[My Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lmd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfxn.com/?p=637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a previous blog I discussed how one of the more enjoyable parts of my day-to-day malware rituals also involves the tracking and killing of command and control bot networks. Recently I have begun automating this process a bit; I have created a series of scripts that extract irc servers, port numbers and channels from <a href="http://www.rfxn.com/tracking-killing-bot-networks/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rfxn.com/tracking-killing-bot-networks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Understanding Signatures</title>
		<link>http://www.rfxn.com/understanding-signatures/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rfxn.com/understanding-signatures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 08:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan M.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lmd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[projects]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfxn.com/?p=652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The signature naming scheme for LMD is a little confusing and something I&#8217;ve received more than a few questions about, more so about what the *.unclassed signatures mean. The naming scheme (to me) is straight forward and breaks down as follows: {SIG_FORMAT}lang/vector.type.name.ID# The &#8216;SIG_FORMAT&#8217; is either HEX or MD5 reflecting the internal format of the <a href="http://www.rfxn.com/understanding-signatures/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rfxn.com/understanding-signatures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

